Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Are you smarter than a 4th grader?

This past October, my chemistry class put on an afternoon of Halloween-themed chemistry demonstrations and activities for 75 4th graders. Exploding pumpkins, ghost eggs, glow-in-the-dark slime, and smoke rings were just a few of their favorites. A week later, I received a packet of 75 handwritten thank you letters. Each was a treasure and whenever I need a 30 second pick me up, I just read one at random.

What was most entertaining though was their creative system of spelling. This is more of an indictment of the English language than it is of our school system so don’t blame the teachers or the parents or the current or past administrations. And certainly don’t blame the students. How well would you do in a handwritten note without a built-in spell checker? Are you smart enough to understand the written language of a 4th grader? See if you can figure out what word they were trying to spell (and have a chuckle on me).


What they wrote

What they meant


actaly

actually


favioet

favorite


exspeshaly

especially


toatle

totally


prodgects

projects


liket

liked


aprisheat

appreciate


cristle

crystal


home-maid

home-made


uneake

unique


favret

favorite


dride

dried


gosht

ghost


alsome

awesome


aswerm

awesome


aswam

awesome


asumwer

more awesome

Just in case you are worried about the future of our civilization based on these results, here is a quote from one of the letters:

Thank you for the interesting Halloween chemistry expirements. The irony of it is, your expirements use dry ice and you asked us questions about it and said that the CO 2 were “ghosts”, but we already knew from science that it was Carbon Dioxide.

A 4th grader even knew to subscript the 2 on CO 2! The English language may be in jeopardy but the future of chemical science will be in good hands. And in case you think he spelled “experiment” wrong, I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt. After doing experiments all my life, I must admit that most would have been more accurately described as “expirements”.

No comments: